Library › St Photius the Great › Homilies
Homilies
St Photius the Great, tr. Mango, 1958
20. The Image of the Virgin in St. Sophia
XVII
Of the Same Most-Blessed Photius, Patriarch of Constantinople, Homily Delivered from the Ambo of the Great Church, on Holy Saturday, in the Presence of the Christ-Loving Emperors, when the Form of the Theotokos had been Depicted and Uncovered.1
Even if a man practised silence all his life long, he would now, above all else, strive to be loquacious and exercise his tongue in the arts of rhetoric. Or rather, he will be emboldened to ask, what he did not dare heretofore, for his lips to be parted with the tongs of the prophet,2 and for his mouth to speak out with the voice of fiery tongues,3 being, methinks, unable to bear the joy in silence, or with still tongue to take pride in this feast. For in truth this feast pours forth the inexhaustible graces of joy and all manner of gladness, drives out sorrow, and charms away all dejection from every face. Indeed, the three greatest things that have happened under the witnessing sun4 (except what directly appertains to the divine working of the Logos)5 shine out in this festival: the invincible power of piety which towers above the vault of heaven, the senseless insolence of impiety which is dragged down to ultimate ruin and the depths of hell, yea, and the monument of folly and ineffaceable disgrace of those who have ended their life in impiety, though deeming to be lifted up thereby6 to great glory and domination (witness the unerring eye7 of the prophets!), transmitted as a forceful lesson to posterity.8 For indeed it is to be seen in many cases that the memory of those men who have used the brief time-span at their disposal for innovations is forever kept fresh by the Eye of Justice for the censure of their crimes. Also, if you will, the godly zeal of the Emperors (and, before the tribunal of Truth, time gone by has none more pious for its adornment),9 through whom the wise teachings of theology blossom and shoot forth, growing out of their reflective soul10 as from some noble and fair root; whence we too have often to our great joy plucked many a ripe fruit which distilled the honey of spiritual salvation. For even if it is we that have sown and first ploughed with much toil the fallow land, yet that too was not independent of imperial zeal and co-operation.11
The white-clad choir of yesterday, which will soon be present, is part of the fruit being borne, and will suffice as evident testimony to everybody. A choir which today are resplendent in white raiment, and radiate the purity of their souls, were for many years past buried in the darkness of error, and were not even conscious of all this murk that submerged them. A numberless throng of men, who in other respects did not appear to have deviated from the true faith as regards divine worship, yet who, from the time when the Nicene edifice of holy dogma was found sufficient12 for the holy Fathers (wherein they set up the pillars of Orthodoxy, and from which not a single holy man was absent, not even of those who inhabited the ends of the world), instead of coming to union thereby, rather segregated themselves into a hostile party, and remained from that time until now uncorrected by the rulings of subsequent councils and unwilling to be amended by the pronouncements of the Fathers. Accusing us of introducing daring innovations into apostolic teaching, they prided themselves on being, of all men under the sun, the only ones who had not deviated from it. Thus did the disease of superstitious prejudice inflame them, and the sickness came nigh to being altogether incurable. In these matters they were puffed up and arrogant towards men of all countries who were adorned with the Christian creed, though themselves confined by Jewish customs, and led by the hand of those whose blindness they themselves did not hesitate to scorn. For they, too, determined the Pasch by the time when the orb of the moon regained its full light and lay diametrically opposite the sun, on the fourteenth day after it was first observed to reflect the sun’s rays to our eyes, subsequent to the spring equinox.13 Hence they were called Tessareskaidekatitai by the truthful judgment of yore. But their error did not stop at that point; once the evil momentum had seized them and torn them away from the teaching of the Fathers, it induced them into bizarre and puerile notions. They used interpolated books, fell into monstrous fables and confounded14 the laws of ecclesiastical primacy. They alleged that baptizands should not be sanctified by the application of holy oil, and they were frenzied with other similar drunken ravings. But having been raised from this absurd depravity, and having escaped the darkness, they have returned in splendid fashion to the paternal fold, increasing to no small extent the body of the Catholic Church.
But perhaps we have been drawn into too lengthy a digression, unwilling as we were to pass over in silence a matter cognate to the one before us,15 and through which the light of truth shines no less brightly. But the cause of the celebration, whereby today’s feast is conspicuously adorned, is, as we have already said, the following: splendid piety erecting trophies against belief hostile to Christ; impiety lying low, stripped of her very last hopes; and the ungodly ideas of those half-barbarous and bastard clans which had crept into the Roman government16 (who were an insult and a disgrace to the emperors) being exposed to everyone as an object of hatred17 and aversion. Yea, and as for us, beloved pair of pious Emperors, shining forth from the purple, connected with the dearest names of father and son,18 and not allowing the name to belie the relation-ship, but striving to set in all other respects also an example of superhuman love, whose preoccupation is Orthodoxy rather than pride in the imperial diadem,—it is in these things that the deed which is before our eyes instigates us to take pride. With such a welcome does the representation of the Virgin’s form cheer us, inviting us to draw not from a bowl of wine, but from a fair spectacle, by which the rational part of our soul, being watered through our bodily eyes, and given eyesight in its growth towards the divine love of Orthodoxy, puts forth in the way of fruit the most exact vision of truth. Thus, even in her images does the Virgin’s grace delight, comfort and strengthen us! A virgin mother carrying in her pure arms, for the common salvation of our kind, the common Creator reclining as an infant—that great and ineffable mystery of the Dispensation! A virgin mother, with a virgin’s and a mother’s gaze, dividing in indivisible form her temperament between both capacities, yet belittling neither by its incompleteness. With such exactitude has the art of painting, which is a reflection of inspiration from above, set up a lifelike imitation.19 For, as it were, she fondly turns her eyes on her begotten Child in the affection of her heart, yet assumes the expression of a detached and imperturbable mood at the passionless and wondrous nature of her offspring, and composes her gaze accordingly. You might think her not incapable of speaking, even if one were to ask her, “How didst thou give birth and remainest a virgin?” To such an extent have the lips been made flesh by the colours, that they appear merely to be pressed together and stilled as in the mysteries,20 yet their silence is not at all inert neither is the fairness of her form derivatory, but rather is it the real archetype.
Seest thou of what beauty was the face of the Church bereft? Of what splendour was it deprived? Over what graces did gloomy dejection prevail? That was the daring deed of a wretched Jewish hand, lacking in no insolence. This is a most conspicuous token of a heart seized by God and of the Lord’s love, whereby the initiated band of the apostles were led to perfection, through which the martyrs’ winged course sped to the crowns of victory, and the prophets, God’s tongues,21 with knowledge of future things and truthful foretelling, came unto men bringing undoubting belief. For verily are these things the prizes and gifts of a most sincere and divine love, from which depends likewise the veneration of holy images, just as their destruction comes from an irrepressible and most foul hatred.22 Those men, after stripping the Church, Christ’s bride, of her own ornaments, and wantonly inflicting bitter wounds on her, wherewith her face was scarred, sought in their insolence to submerge her in deep oblivion, naked as she was, so to speak, and unsightly, and afflicted with those many wounds—herein too emulating Jewish folly. Still bearing on her body the scars of those wounds, in reproof of their Isaurian and godless belief, and wiping them off, and in their stead putting on the splendour of her own glory, she now regains the ancient dignity of her comeliness, and sheds the rude mockery of those who have insulted her, pitying their truly absurd madness. If one called this day the beginning and day of Orthodoxy (lest I say something excessive), one would not be far wrong. For though the time is short since the pride of the iconoclastic heresy has been reduced to ashes, and true religion has spread its light to the ends of the world, fired like a beacon by imperial and divine command, this too is our ornament; for it is the achievement of the same God-loving reign.
And so, as the eye of the universe, this celebrated and sacred church, looked sad with its visual mysteries scraped off, as it were (for it had not yet received the privilege of pictorial restoration),23 it shed but faint rays from its face to visitors, and in this respect the countenance of Orthodoxy appeared gloomy. Now, casting off this sadness also, and beautifying herself with all her own conspicuous ornaments, and displaying her rich dowry, gladly and joyously she hearkens to the Bridegroom’s voice, Who cries out saying, “All fair is my companion, and there is no spot in her. Fair is my companion.”24 For, having mingled the bloom of colours with religious truth, and by means of both having in holy manner fashioned unto herself a holy beauty, and bearing, so to speak, a complete and perfect image of piety, she is seen not only to be fair in beauty surpassing the sons of men,25 but elevated to an inexpressible fairness of dignity beyond any comparison beside.26 All fair is my companion. She has escaped the blows, has been freed of her wounds, has wiped off all blemish, has cast down her detractors into Hell, has raised up those who sang her praises. And there is no spot in her. She has overcome the blemishes wherewith a foul foreign hand had aimed and spotted her whole body. She has wiped off all those stains, and taking up again her former bridal raiment, she has put it on. The daughters saw her, and they will bless her; yea, the queens, and they will praise her. Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the moon, choice as the sun?27 This then is the dignity and royal raiment which David was describing from of old, when he sang hymns to the Lord and King of all: “The queen stood by on thy right hand, clothed in vesture wrought with gold, and arrayed in divers colours.”28 Verily are her “steps beautiful.”29 Awake, O Sion, as in the early time, as the ancient generation,30 for up on thy head shall come exultation and praise and joy.31 “I, even I, am he that comforts thee,” saith the Lord.32 “Behold, I have painted thy walls on my hands, and thou art continually before me.”33 This is her joyousness she herself foresaw when she exclaimed prophetically through Isaiah, saying, “Let my soul rejoice in the Lord; for He has clothed me in the robe of salvation, and the garment of joy, and has put a mitre on me as on a bridegroom, and adorned me with ornaments as a bride.34 And no longer shall I be as a city forsaken, but as one sought out,35 and as a crown of beauty in the hand of the Lord, and a royal diadem in the hand of God.”36
We too, with gladness and joy in our the souls, join the choir of this festival, and sharing today in the celebration of this restoration, we exclaim those prophetic words,37 saying, “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Sion; cry aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem. The Lord has taken away thine injuries; He has delivered thee from the hand of thine enemies.38 Lift up thine eyes round about, and see thy children gathered. For behold, all thy sons have come from far, yea and thy daughters,39 bearing unto thee not gold and frankincense40 and stones, all begotten of the earth and by human custom adorning what is precious, but purer than all gold, and more precious than all stones, the ancestral faith unadulterated. Rejoice and delight thyself with all thine heart,41 for behold, the Lord is coming, and He shall fix His tabernacle in thy midst.”42 What could be more agreeable than this day? What could be more explicit than this feast to give expression to gladness and joy? This is another shaft being driven today right through the heart of Death, not as the Saviour is engulfed by the tomb of mortality for the common resurrection of our kind, but as the image of the Mother rises up from the very depths of oblivion, and raises along with herself the likenesses of the saints. Christ came to us in the flesh, and was borne in the arms of His Mother. This is seen and confirmed and proclaimed in pictures, the teaching made manifest by means of personal eyewitness, and impelling the spectators to unhesitating assent. Does a man hate the teaching by means of pictures? Then how could he not have previously rejected and hated the message of the Gospels? Just as speech is transmitted by hearing, so a form through sight is imprinted upon the tablets of the soul, giving to those whose apprehension is not soiled by wicked doctrines a representation of knowledge concordant with piety. Martyrs have suffered for their love of God, showing with their blood the ardour of their desire,43 and their memory is contained in books. These deeds they are also seen performing in pictures,44 as painting presents the martyrdom of those blessed men more vividly to our knowledge.45 Others have been burnt alive, a sacrifice sanctified by their prayer, fasting and other labours. These things are conveyed both by stories and by pictures, but it is the spectators rather than the hearers who are drawn to emulation. The Virgin is holding the Creator in her arms as an infant. Who is there who would not marvel, more from the sight of it than from the report, at the magnitude of the mystery, and would not rise up to laud the ineffable condescension that surpasses all words? For even if the one introduces the other, yet the comprehension that comes about through sight is shown in very fact to be far superior to the learning that penetrates through the ears. Has a man lent his ear to a story? Has his intelligence visualized and drawn to itself what he has heard? Then, after judging it with sober attention, he deposits it in his memory. No less—indeed much greater—is the power of sight. For surely, having somehow through the outpouring and effluence of the optical rays touched and encompassed the object, it too sends the essence of the thing seen on to the mind, letting it be conveyed from there to the memory for the concentration of unfailing knowledge.46 Has the mind seen?47 Has it grasped? Has it visualized? Then it has effortlessly transmitted the forms to the memory.
Is there one who rejects the holy writings on these matters and, in spite of the fact that all lies are dispelled by them, considers them to be not above dispute? Then this man has long since transgressed by scorning the veneration of holy images. Does he, on the contrary, reverence the latter, and honour them with proper respect? Then he will be disposed likewise towards the writings. If he treats either one with reverence or with contempt, he necessarily bestows the same on the other, unless, in addition to being impious, he has also abandoned reason, and is not only irreverent, but also preaches things which are in conflict with his own position. Those, therefore, who have slipped into assailing the holy images are proved not to have kept the correctness of doctrine either, but with the one they abjure the other. They do not dare confess what they believe, chary, not of being impious, but of appearing so; and they avoid the name whereof they willingly pursue the actions. Abominable in their misdeeds, they are more abominable in their impiety. Their whole offshoot has perished, branches, roots and all, even as the wondrous David in his canticles sings of the memorial of the impious being destroyed with a noise,48 and it is He Whom they have set at nought through His picture Who has passed righteous judgment on them. But before our eyes stands motionless the Virgin carrying the Creator in her arms as an infant, depicted in painting as she is in writings and visions, an interceder for our salvation and a teacher of reverence to God, a grace of the eyes and a grace of the mind, carried by which the divine love in us is uplifted to the intelligible beauty of truth.49
But what is to become of me, driven as I am at the same time to speak and to be silent? For such is the charm of the subject before me that I prefer to continue speaking without ever being sated by speech. But time, which flows on and knows no delay, urges me to conclude my speech with silence and turn to another compelling duty.50 Yet, since time can no longer be grasped once it is passed,51 and as for the topic, even if we talked all our life about it, no one would succeed in expressing it worthily, so, as it is ill to fail in both respects, I shall do what I can and ought, and at the bidding of time consent to be silent. But O Word and Bridegroom and substantiated Wisdom of the Father, Whose name this sacred and holy temple bears, grant us forgiveness for what has been inadequately said. For it is Thine wont to look not at the deficiencies but at the intention, and to make that the standard for the gift, instead of weighing the words according to their worth. Grant those also who have received it through Thee to reign on earth to consecrate the remainder of the church too with holy images; and as they have been made by Thee to be the eyes of the universe,52 so guard them like the pupil of the eye, place them above any bad influence, showing them terrible and irresistible to the foes, gracious and salutary to their subjects, and render them, together with us, worthy of Thine endless and blessed kingdom. For Thine is the power and the honour and the veneration, of the consubstantial, life-giving and all-powerful Trinity, now and for ever and ever. Amen.
Notes
- The complete title, preserved in A, B and Lig, is as follows: τοῦ αὐτοῦ ἁγιωτάτου Φωτίου πατριάρχου Κωνσταντινουπόλεως, ὁμιλία λεχθεῖσα ἐν τῷ ἄμβωνι τῆς μεγάλης ἐκκλησίας τῷ μεγάλῳ σαββάτῳ, ἐπὶ παρουσίᾳ τοῦ φιλοχρίστου βασιλέως [τῶν φιλοχρίστων βασιλέων Ar], ὅτε τῆς [ἡ τῆς Cod. Athen. 2756, Ar] θεοτόκου ἐξεικονίσθη καὶ ἀνεκαλύφθη [ἀπεκαλύφθη Ar] μορφή. Ar’s correction τῶν φιλοχρίστων βασιλέων should probably be retained, as the presence of two emperors is made perfectly clear by the text of the Homily. Cod. Athen. 2756 has not preserved the complete title. In Cod. Palat. 129 the title is ἐπὶ τῇ στηλογραφίᾳ τῆς ὀρθοδοξίας.
- Cf. Is. 6. 6.
- Cf. Acts 2. 3.
- Read τῶν ὑφ᾽ ἡλίῳ [ὑφ᾽ ἥλιον Ar] πεπραγμένων μάρτυρι.
- πλὴν ὅσα μὴ θεουργικὸς ἐξαιρεῖται λόγος, literally “save for those things which the divinely-working Word sets apart for Himself.” In other words, the three lessons contained in the festival represent the most significant things that have ever happened on earth, except for events such as the Incarnation, which are direct manifestations of God’s workings. This passage is an important illustration of Photius’ view of history as a didactic process.
- Read ἐξ ἧς [sc. ἀσεβείας: ἐξ ἧς που Pg: ἐξ ὅτου Ar] ἔδοξαν ἐπὶ μέγα δόξης καὶ δυναστείας ἐπαίρεσθαι. The men who had hoped to attain glory and power by impiety were, of course, the Iconoclasts. This remark is especially apt in the case of Leo V who, after pondering on the glorious careers of the Isaurian emperors and the unhappy reigns of their Iconodule successors, came to the conclusion that Iconoclasm was indeed the road to victory and happiness (Script. incert. de Leone Bardae filio, Bonn ed. [along with Leo Grammaticus], p. 349).
- Read ὄμμα with the MSS: στόμα Ar.
- τῷ μακρῷ αἰῶνι σὺν ἀκμῇ παραπεμπόμενα [παραπεμπόμενον Ar], a curious phrase. Cod. Palat. 129 (fol. 141r) has τῷ μακρῷ αἰῶνι σὺν ἀκμῇ παραπεμπόμενα τὰ κακά. The meaning seems to be that the memorial of the Iconoclasts’ wickedness will be remembered for all eternity without loss of forcefulness. ἀκμή is probably used in the sense of “vigour.” It is defined as ὀξύτης or δύναμις in Photius’ Lexicon (Reitzenstein, Der Anfang des Lexikons des Photios [1907], p. 61; so also Suidas, s. v.) ἀκμή was also a rhetorical term denoting a climax or elevated forcefulness of speech. Cf. Hermogenes, Περὶ ἰδεῶν, I. 10.
- Reading ὧν ὁ παρελθὼν οὐκ ἔχει [so Pg: ὁ παρελθὼν οὐχὶ codd: ὁ παρελθὼν οὐκ ἦν Ar] χρόνος ὑπ᾽ ἀληθείᾳ [ἐπ’ ἀληθείᾳ Ar] δικαζούσῃ [δικάζων Ar] εὖσεβεστέροις ἐγκαλλωπίζεσθαι [so B: ἐγκαλλωπίσμασι A, Lig: εὐσεβέστερα ἐγκαλλωπίσματα Ar].
- φιλοθεάμονος ψυχῆς, a Platonic term (literally “spectacle-loving”). In Rep. 475e Plato uses τῆς ἀληθείας φιλοθεάμονες of the philosophers who loved the contemplation of truth. Quoted by Clement of Alexandria, Strom., I. xix. 93. 3; II. v. 24. 3; V. iii. 16. 2.
- A significant passage. While congratulating the Emperor on his religious zeal, Photius plainly ascribes to himself the initiative in propagating orthodoxy, which in this context refers specifically to the suppression of Iconoclasm.
- The MSS read: ἐξότου [i. e. ἐξ ὅτου] δὲ Νίκαια πατράσιν ἱερεῖς [i. e. ἱεροῖς] ἱερῶν δογμάτων ἐξήρκεσε τέμενος, Ar’s correction ἐξήρτυσε for ἐξήρκεσε is not without merit.
- A very confused sentence: ἡροῦντο γὰρ καὶ αὐτοὶ τὸ πάσχα κατ᾽ ἐκεῖνο καιροῦ καθ᾽ ὃν ὁ τῆς σελήνης πλησιφαὴς ἀποκαθίσταται [ἀποκαθίστατο Cod. Palat. 129, fol. 122r] δίσκος τῷ ἡλίῳ διαμετρούμενος, τεσσαρεσκαιδεκάτην ἀγούσης μετ᾽ ἰσημερίαν τοῦ ἔαρος ἀφ’ ἧς [sc. ἡμέρας understood] ὕπαυγος ταῖς ἡλιακαῖς ἀκτίσι πρὸς τὴν ἡμετέραν ὄψιν ἐκρίνετο. The phrase μετ᾽ ἰσημερίαν τοῦ ἔαρος is somewhat awkwardly placed, since the full moon of Nisan is not 14 days after the spring equinox, as Photius appears on first sight to be saying. The spring equinox was, of course, a fixed date in the solar calendar, and did not, therefore, bear any determined relation to the first lunar month. The ancient Jewish Pasch had always to be after the spring equinox, but owing to a calendar revision ca. the 2nd century A.D., the observance of the equinox was abandoned, with the result that there could be two Paschs within one solar year. This situation existed at the time of the First Nicene Council, and probably applied to the Quartodecimans as well. As described by Photius, however, the usage of the Quartodecimans took the spring equinox into account. Photius was well acquainted with the subject, having perused several works on Paschal computations which dealt directly with the Quartodecimans (Bibliotheca, codd. 115, 116).
- Reading ἀρχιεροσύνης τε συγχέοντες [συνέχοντες codd, Ar] νόμους. This correction is due to Mr. G. L. Kustas.
- Reading οὐκ ἀνασχομένους [so Pg: ἀνασχομένου codd, Ar] πρᾶξιν ἀδελφὴν τῆς προκειμένης [τοῖς προκειμένοις Ar] σιγῇ παρελθεῖν.
- Iconoclasm did in fact draw most of its support from the non-Hellenic elements of Asia Minor. …
- Read μῖσος with the MSS: μύσος Ar. Cf. below, n. 22.
- Basil was Michael’s adopted son (Theoph. Cont., p. 238).
- ὑπόκρισις ἄρα τῆς ἄνωθεν ἐπιπνοίας ἡ ζωγράφος [ζωγράφου Uspenskij, Ar] τέχνη, οὕτως ἀκριβῶς εἰς φύσιν τὴν μίμησιν ἔστησεν [so Cod. Chalc. 64, fol. 301r and Pg: ἕστηκε A, Ar: ἔστηκε B].
- ὡς ἐν μυστηρίοις codd: μυστηρίῳ Uspenskij, Ar.
- Reading προφῆται, θεοῦ γλῶσσαι: προφητῶν Ar.
- Reading μίσους with the MSS: μύσους Ar. Cf. above, n. 17.
- The very important clause τῆς γὰρ εἰκονουργικῆς ἀναστηλώσεως οὔπω ἀπειλήφει τὸ δικαίωμα has been excised from the text by Ar who, no doubt, considered it a gloss.
- Cf. Solomon’s Song 4. 7.
- Ps. 44. 3.
- The precise meaning of this sentence is not altogether clear. The MSS read: οὐ παρὰ τοὺς υἱοὺς τῶν ἀνθρώπων ὡραία κάλλεϊ γνωρίζεται, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὰς [τὰς corrected to τὴν Lig: τὰς omitted by Uspenskij and Ar] παρ’ οὕστινας οὖν ἑτέρους εἰς ἄφραστον εὐπρεπείας ἐξήρτηται [ἐξήρτυται Uspenskij, Ar] ὡραιότητα. The sense seems to require the insertion of μόνον after οὐ. Uspenskij’s corrections have some merit, though he himself completely misunderstood the meaning, witness his translation (p. 35): “she is acknowledged beautiful not only by the sons of mankind, but is also praised by God-inspired men (?) for her ineffable beauty.”
- Song 6. 9–10.
- Ps. 44. 10.
- Song 7. 2.
- Cf. Is. 51. 9.
- Is. 51. 11.
- Is. 51. 12.
- Is. 49. 16.
- Is. 61. 10.
- Cf. Is. 62. 12.
- Is. 62. 3.
- The word φωνὰς has been supplied by Pg.
- Zeph. 3. 14–15.
- Is. 60. 4.
- Is. 60. 6.
- Zeph. 3. 14.
- Zeph. 3. 15.
- Read τὸ φίλτρον τοῦ πόθου with the MSS: τὸ φίλτερον Ar.
- Reading διαπραττόμενοι (sc. μάρτυρες) with the MSS: διαπραττόμενα Ar.
- Reading ἐναργεστέραν τῆς γραφῆς παρεχομένης with the MSS: παρεχομέναις Ar.
- πρὸς ἐπιστήμην ἀπλανεστάτην συνάθροισιν codd: πρὸς ἐπιστήμης ἀπλανεστάτην συνάθροισιν Ar. I would prefer πρὸς ἐπιστήμης ἀπλανεστάτης συνάθροισιν.
- Read εἶδεν ὁ νοῦς with the MSS: οἶδεν Ar.
- Ps. 9. 7.
- Read with the MSS: αἷς [sc. χάρισι understood] εἰς τὸ νοητὸν τῆς ἀληθείας κάλλος ὁ ἐν ἡμῖν θεῖος ἔρως ὀχούμενος ἀναφέρεται [ἧς for αἷς ... ἀναφύρεται Ar].
- I. e. the celebration of the liturgy.
- Reading τὸν μὲν οὐκ ἔστι [so Pg: οὐκ ἔτι A, Lig: οὐκέτι B, Ar] λαβεῖν παρελθόντα.
- The MSS read καὶ οἷά περ [so B: οἷαπερ A, Lig] τῆς οἰκουμένης ὑπὸ σοῦ τεχθέντας [ταχθέντας Ar] ὀφθαλμούς.